(Which probably explains this weblog's approach as much as Your Correspondent--somewhat far-fetched, yet eclectic with the occasional overtures towards the Monty Pythonic, historic--or even alluding to old-time radio.
(Yet, through it all, creating a healing time and space beyond reality for you--or trying to.)
Now with FREE webmail!
Yes, you can actually have your very own e-mail address @exaggerator.zzn.com, accessible anytime, anywhere you access the Information Stuporbahn!
(Or, if you already have a website, add free web-based e-mail to your website!)
Just click the button of your choice to learn more:
I love the likes of:
N.B. Voting for the 2008 edition will close on 15 October; hence, your vote now in the four categories where this blog has been nominate would be welcome and appreciated.
Thanks again for your support, or reasonable facsimilie thereof.
In the interest of saving you time, Your Correspondent has elected to offer feed subscriptions through these "one-stop" resources, allowing you to sign up for subscriptions in multiple RSS feed readers which you may be using, including some for mobile phones, from one website:
For bloggers like myself, dependent for the most part on disability benefit from Social Security, such can only go so far month after month. That, and the obvious fact that blogging per se not exactly enough to put food on the table.
As well, I receive no outside monies of any sort to help with blogging-related activities or expenses (notwithstanding what Fox Prolefeed accuses bloggers like ourselves of being from time to time).
Hence, the need to raise money to help with the costs of blogging, over and above one's own (usually limited) resources--especially if one is on disability benefit such as Your Correspondent.
For starters, your donations (howbeit not tax-deductible) would be welcome into my Virtual Tip Jar:
You might also want to check out my new e-boutique, The Exaggerator Collection by name:
...or any of these fine e-tailers with whom The Exaggerator is an affiliate:
(Just so you know: Your purchases are a show of support for this weblog and the blogger behind it. Not to mention A Few Good Causes, details of which are available on request.)
(part 2):
Think of these as "win-win" solutions, not just for those among you webmasters or bloggers looking for extra income (so long as the host's Terms of Service allow you to participate in affiliate programmes) ... but also for Your Correspondent:
Memo to online businesses wanting to become established by taking orders online: See what PayPal can offer you. (But please: Use it for good. Not for fraud.)
SINCE TEXAS CHILD-WELFARE OFFICIALS INVADED THE YEARNING FOR ZION COMPOUND OF THE SO-CALLED "FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS" (FLDS) early last month, eventually taking care and custody of some 462 girls and women (many of them now revealed to be pregnant or otherwise nursing the fruits of their "celestial marriages"), Your Correspondent has wondered when it would reach the point where certain Zealots and True Believers among the Religiopolitical Right would be playing the rather idiotic singsong meme of "Christian Persecution! Christian Persecution!" (in the key of "Ring around the collar!") in trying to defend the FLDS.
Which may be but the beginning of this rather pathetic meme's crossing into the overdone by the Dark Satanic Mills of Conservative "Winning of Hearts and Minds" Propaganda: ConWebBlog, an adjunct of ConWebWatch, notes how WorldNetDaily is playing up the meme of the FLDS being a "Victim of Christian Persecution" by way of the MSM:
Earlier this week, WorldNetDaily's Joseph Farah offered up a mild defense of the polygamist cult in Texas, mostly in the name of the right of parents to treat children like chattel. Now, another WND columnist, Ilana Mercer, goes full bore in defending the cult and the child-as-parental-chattel concept.
Mercer's April 25 column begins by painting an idyllic picture of cult life as a place where children are "frolicking in the open air on a large compound, doing your daily chores and feasting on hearty homegrown fare," but have now been "torn from their loving mothers" and sent to a world where "you're gagging on a diet of T&A courtesy of MTV and fast-food compliments of your fat foster mom. As the makeshift mom hollers at you to swallow your zombifying meds." In fact, the Texas Department of Child Protective Services has issued strict guidelines to caretakers of the children taken from the polygamist compound, including "No television, movies, Internet and radio especially at first," and no red clothing because the cult believes that red is reserved for Jesus Christ because when he returns, he will be wearing red robes.
Mercer then launches into the child-as-parental-chattel defense, as well as the polygamist cult:
Whether they are "plural" or single, Wicca or just weird, bohemian or bourgeoisie – parents should take the kids and skedaddle when they hear that phrase "in the best interests of the child." It is simply a license for the state to substitute its own judgment for that of the parents. Today, it's polygamist parents – Kool-Aid drinkers is Bill O'Reilly's favored sobriquet. Tomorrow, it'll be the offspring of homeschoolers or global warming deniers.
[...]
Whatever are your voyeuristic fantasies about the sex romps on a polygamist commune, of this you can be certain: Relative to the loose, licentious, libertine and precarious foster-care environment, the children seized in the raid on the FLDS property have led a sheltered, chaste life. The gravest abuse still awaits them.
Right. Apparently, in Mercer's view, being stuck in a relationship as a teen girl with multiple co-wives is not "abuse," nor is kicking teen boys out of the cult for specious reasons and into a world for which they have not been prepared in order to reduce the male population inside the cult. Apparently that's OK with her because it's the parents doing the abusing.
Then again, remember that Mercerdefended Michael Vick against the dogfighting charges against him because "all animals are property."
Isn't this, in effect, playing the "Christian Persecution!" meme card right there?
