(AS IN THE MARTIN LUTHER KING, JNR. DAY SNOWSTORM here in southeastern Minnesota, making a general mess of things as disrupted travel alongside cold weather in general.)

*************

PERHAPS IT WAS TIME THAT THOSE WHITE SUPREMACISTS AS WERE MARCHING THROUGH JENA, LOUISANA yesterday in protest of the Martin Luther King holiday, all the while bellyaching that "poor white trash" had been losing their "traditional rights, privileges and powers" for some time now to the point of their risking "marginalisation" as "second-class citizens" they had always wanted blacks and other National Minorities considered, started to get a life for once.

Notwithstanding their inevitable invocation of Holy Scripture and all manner of bromides and platitudes about "unwritten law" entitling whites to a "privileged" status above all other peoples such specimens of hard-wired Zealotry and True Belief enjoy using, perhaps it was time they realised that "it's a small world, after all," and that they should realise that the only race which matters is the human race.

Even considering their arrogance-laden hubris made all the more so by their poverty, ignorance and unwillingness to recognise change being inevitable. Not to mention their dependency upon Al Cohol perhaps making things worse (has anybody considered just such a possibility among racist and white-supremacist elements from the ranks of the poor, undereducated and easily-led?).

*************

IF EVER THERE WERE ARGUMENTS FOR APPLYING THE "MORAL HAZARD" LABEL to such making unwise decisions all the more, perhaps His Fraudulency's Great Within deserves it all the more.

For it's their misguided delusion of offering advanced tax rebates from $800 in the name of socioeconomic stimulation and, in turn, National Unity and Identity (or so the Great Within must be thinking) as is sending the equities markets into heartburn mode, and then some. Especially so yesterday, where bourses in Australasia and Europe took advantage of the Martin Luther King, Jnr. holiday in the United States to the point where local market indices fell in some of their steepest one-day dives since the Unfortunate Events of 9/11.

Wall Street's reopening after the Holiday Long Weekend even saw them reacting to such misguided thought following further market declines overseas on the overnight, not to mention the Federal Reserve Board being forced to cut a key interest rate by 0.75%: In just the first few minutes of trading, the DowJones Industrials index slipped some 420 points, barely enough to trigger a halt to trading. (The Dow has since recovered most of the losses, but still, the same is off and then some.)

How do we know that His Fraudulency's "inside of the inside," perhaps, isn't secretly profiting on the fringes of propriety by way of short-selling as only profits from the whole morass?

*************

HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF YOU WERE SEEN ON SECURITY-CAMERA FOOTAGE FROM A SUBWAY NETWORK in a major city as was subsequently uploaded onto YouTube or similar websites, along with condescending comments on the side--and said footage managed to generate 15,000 hits within 48 hours of posting?

Embarrassed, come to think of it.

Which is exactly the case with a couple who are suing the operators of the Shanghai Metro network for Invasion of Privacy and Unwarranted Embarrassment after security-camera footage showing the couple in a romantic embrace on the platform of a Metro station was uploaded onto YouTube and a local knockoff in that vein, Ku6.com--along with snide remarks on the side.

The man in the controversial video was subsequently forced to resign his position after receiving embarrassing comments about the video ... and officials with the Shanghai Metro are reviewing the situation to see where official policies went wrong.

=============

SUCH A PRECEDENT NO DOUBT BRINGS TO MIND the following (howbeit, for the most part, anecdotal) warning about potentially improper use of security-camera footage by way of the "WaiWai" feature in Japan's Mainichi Daily News, highlighting as it does the more interesting specimens of what pass for articles in the Japanese gutter press:

Watch out! In the surveillance society of Noughties Japan, during your most intimate moments, someone is probably watching you, according to Spa! (11/20).

Surveillance cameras are common throughout Japan and in fact because they have become so pervasive, they occasionally border on perversive.

"We have security cameras set up in our changing rooms, but only the men's," a man working at a public bathhouse tells Spa! "Sometimes we only set up dummy cameras, but usually they are installed in such a way that nobody even realizes they're there."

From bathhouses to [brothels] is not such a big step, and it's one that many Japanese sex joints have taken.

"We have security cameras in our reception area and waiting rooms," a spokesman for a handjob bar chain says. "All the footage is monitored at company headquarters and people working where the images are taken can't see them. Still, I'd say just about every sex joint is doing this nowadays."

Private booth peep shows are popular attractions for horny young men, but many don't realize that by visiting them could unwittingly be putting themselves before the cameras.

"Footage lifted from peep show booths are a staple for homosexual videos," the operator of a bar in Tokyo's gay quarter of Shinjuku Ni-Chome tells Spa! "It's really easy to find movies of guys in these booths as they [masturbate]."

Wataru Kobayashi, who takes sub-contracting jobs for cleaning Japan's ubiquitous love hotels, says cameras are no secret in these types of establishments, either.

"The owner of a love hotel in Shinjuku once took me out to a staff room in the back of his hotel and showed me the security area. There were all these monitors showing security camera footage, but it wasn't just the entrance area and elevators - they had footage taken from every room. And there were VCRs there recording all of it," Kobayashi tells Spa! "Apparently, they were taking the footage because lots of people who use them take drugs or smoke marijuana in there and the owners want to be able to present the footage as evidence in case they're raided by the police. At least, that's what the owner said. And other love hotels are apparently collecting footage from their rooms, too. But I think only the owners of these hotels are able to look at the images they've captured."

*************

MEMO TO THOSE IN HOLLYWOOD ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE POSTAL BALLOT FOR THE ACADEMY AWARDS from the shortlist announced this morning:

In the category of Best Animated Feature, may I suggest giving the vote to Surf's Up over Ratatouille, if only as a way of showing that feature-length cinema animation should not necessarily be the sole monopoly of Disney/Pixar, which can easily get to be hackneyed after awhile.

Not to mention Shrek the Third being slighted in this category, thereby opening the door for Surf's Up getting serious attention in this the Hollywood awards silly season--especially considering its "mockumentary" stylee, as in The Endless Summer meets This is Spinal Tap meets Happy Feet (that last one inspiring a well-placed jab very early on, where Cody Maverick, the subject of the whole, is asked whether he had other interests besides surfing, whereupon Cody replies "You mean, like singing and dancing?")

=============

INTERESTING BIT OF TRIVIA ABOUT CODY MAVERICK: He happens to be a rockhopper penguin, as witness the characteristically curving yellow eyebrows in especially facial shots.

Equally noteworthy is where Pen Gu Island's resident lifeguard, Lani, is a gentoo penguin--as well as a close relative of Zeke "Big Z" Topanga, a/k/a Geek, a onetime penguin surfah hero fallen into disgrace, only to be "born again" by a chance encounter after sea-urchin spines get caught in Cody's feet during a rough wipeout.

In contrast, Reggie Belafonte, the bombastic surf promoter who, by his own admission, "made" Big Z (and has similar designs on Cody, were it not for his former protege), is a sea otter and his talent scout, Mort "I can't imagine a better day" Abramowitz, is a sandpiper.  

Moving right along with this public service effort to use the provisions of the constitutions of the several States to challenge an article of faith among certain elements of the Pseudoreligiopolitical Right challenging the legality, as much as the constitutionality, of:

• State authority to establish systems of free public education; and
• proscriptions in State constitutions on the use of public funds for religiosectarian instruction.

Your Correspondent proceeds with:

NORTH CAROLINA:

• The General Assembly shall provide by taxation and otherwise for a general and uniform system of free public schools, which shall be maintained at least nine months in every year, and wherein equal opportunities shall be provided for all students. (Article X, section 2(a), North Carolina State Constitution)

• The proceeds of all lands that have been or hereafter may be granted by the United States to this State, and not otherwise appropriated by this State or the United States; all moneys, stocks, bonds, and other property belonging to the State for purposes of public education; the net proceeds of all sales of the swamp lands belonging to the State; and all other grants, gifts, and devises that have been or hereafter may be made to the State, and not otherwise appropriated by the State or by the terms of the grant, gift, or devise, shall be paid into the State Treasury and, together with so much of the revenue of the State as may be set apart for that purpose, shall be faithfully appropriated and used exclusively for establishing and maintaining a uniform system of free public schools. (Article X, section 6, op. cit.)

NORTH DAKOTA:

• A high degree of intelligence, patriotism, integrity and morality on the part of every voter in a government by the people being necessary in order to insure the continuance of that government and the prosperity and happiness of the people, the legislative assembly shall make provision for the establishment and maintenance of a system of public schools which shall be open to all children of the state of North Dakota and free from sectarian control. This legislative requirement shall be irrevocable without the consent of the United States and the people of North Dakota. (Article VIII, section 1, North Dakota Constitution)

• The legislative assembly shall provide for a uniform system of free public schools throughout the state, beginning with the primary and extending through all grades up to and including schools of higher education, except that the legislative assembly may authorize tuition, fees and service charges to assist in the financing of public schools of higher education. (Article VIII, section 2, op. cit.)

• All colleges, universities, and other educational institutions, for the support of which lands have been granted to this state, or which are supported by a public tax, shall remain under the absolute and exclusive control of the state. No money raised for the support of the public schools of the state shall be appropriated to or used for the support of any sectarian school. (Article VIII, section 5, op. cit.)

OHIO:

• The General Assembly shall make such provisions, by taxation, or otherwise, as, with the income arising from the school trust fund, will secure a thorough and efficient system of common schools throughout the state; but no religious or other sect, or sects, shall ever have any exclusive right to, or control of, any part of the school funds of this state. (Article 6.02, Ohio Constitution)
• Provision shall be made by law for the organization, administration and control of the public school system of the state supported by public funds: provided, that each school district embraced wholly or in part within any city shall have the power by referendum vote to determine for itself the number of members and the organization of the district board of education, and provision shall be made by law for the exercise of this power by such school districts. (Article 6.03, op. cit.)

OKLAHOMA:

• The Legislature shall establish and maintain a system of free public schools wherein all the children of the State may be educated. (Article XIII, section 1, Oklahoma Constitution)

• All proceeds of the sale of public lands that have heretofore been or may be hereafter given by the United States for the use and benefit of the common schools of this State, all such per centum as may be granted by the United States on the sales of public lands, the sum of five million dollars appropriated to the State for the use and benefit of the common schools in lieu of sections sixteen and thirty-six, and other lands of the Indian Territory, the proceeds of all property that shall fall to the State by escheat, the proceeds of all gifts or donations to the State for common schools not otherwise appropriated by the terms of the gifts, and such other appropriations, gifts, or donations as shall be made by the Legislature for the benefit of the common schools, shall constitute the permanent school fund, the income from which shall be used for the maintenance of the common schools in the State. The principal shall be deemed a trust fund held by the State, and shall forever remain inviolate. It may be increased, but shall never be diminished. The State shall reimburse said permanent school fund for all losses thereof which may in any manner occur, and no portion of said fund shall be diverted for any other use or purpose. (Article XI, section 2, op. cit.)

OREGON:

• The Legislative Assembly shall provide by law for the establishment of a uniform, and general system of Common schools. (Article VIII, section 3, Oregon Constitution)

PENNSYLVANIA:

• The General Assembly shall provide for the maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education to serve the needs of the Commonwealth. (Article III(B), section 14, Pennsylvania Constitution)

• No money raised for the support of the public schools of the Commonwealth shall be appropriated to or used for the support of any sectarian school. (Article III(B), section 15, op. cit.)

JUST YESTERDAY IN THIS SPACE, YOUR CORRESPONDENT SUGGESTED THE LIKELIHOOD for where so-called "cashflow gifting" schemes may be emerging in certain bastions of socioeconomic uncertainty or vulnerability before too long in the wake of an emerging round of socioeconomic dislocation.

Especially the kind as operate on the Information Stuporbahn, utilising the likes of PayPal in misguided efforts @ privacy and legitimacy notwithstanding 18 USC 1343 (Fraud by Wire, Radio or Television).

But then again, such "gifting clubs" may actually be a perversion (and deliberate) of the "mutual self-help" concept used to promote such in the first place. In evidence, MLM Watchdog has the following testimony of a participant in one such online "gifting" scheme, "5-Star Gifting," suggesting where the whole may be rigged by deliberate design (emphasis from original):

The person that runs this program who calls himself David Rosen which apparently not even his real name controls the software and has been manipulating the software such that gifts automatically go to him that should be gifted to others. He is basically using the software as an automated theft tool. Often people are not aware he is stealing from them because they either do not understand how the software is suppose to work or he just tells them that it wasnt working properly and it is fixed now after thousands of dollars have been gifted to him that should have gone to others. The software is routinely manipulated to route gifts to his position at the top. There are many people in this program that can verify what I  have written here. David whatever he calls himself is a thief that should be in jail. Right now he is making thousands of dollars a day off a program that is totally corrupt.

Which is enough to prompt Your Correspondent to challenge such involved in automated gifting scams generally to do the following:

1. Identify the specific software programmes used in connexion with these "gifting club" schemes, and where you obtained them. (This includes any open-source such.)
2. Identify the original scripting (as was intended to route funds thus "gifted" to those participating), and the manipulated such (as routes funds only to the "elect***entitled as of right), in these programs.
3. Identify such points in the program's scripting code and/or algorithm, as the case may be, where the manipulation occured.
4. Please Explain why you reconfigured the scripting code/algorithm in question to justify perverting "mutual self-help" in "gifting club" form towards Unfair Enrichment, and why you continue promoting "gifting" as "mutual self-help" in the circumstances.
5. If you use services like PayPal, Please Explain whether use of these payment services required manipulating the relevant scripting code/algorithm, and why.
6. Produce "clean" (i.e., without the deliberate inclusion of malware, other malicious scripting codes or other programming flaws) copies of the software in question (both "proper" and perverted forms) for analysis by law-enforcement agencies and (even better yet, though unlikely) such studying and promoting mutual self-help initiatives in name and in fact.

That last suggestion of sharing the "cleaned" software in a form as actually serves the cause of mutual self-help might be a longshot ... but nonetheless, I think such could actually be the foundation of a viable, and @ once worthwhile, online mutual self-help model as may interest such specimens of conservative Zealotry and True Belief looking for practical models of welfare-ersatz and denationalised State Social Security based on mutual self-help as its foundation.

Otherwise known as the English Friendly Society model, based on the Holloway Tables rather than flawed exponential maths and the Fibonacci Sequences commonly used by "gifting" elements.

But then again, how best to sell such to the Great Unwashed without attracting suspicions on their part that such may be a scam, while @ the same time expecting them to accept that the State may no longer be able to continue providing their safety net, placing more responsibility on their own part?

And doing so without pandering to latent racist stereotypes or feelings in excusing such thought?

Comments can be left in the relevant section. 

IN PRACTICALLY EVERY PRESS RELEASE COMING OUT OF THE RON PAUL PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN involving Mr. Paul's campaign appearences, one phrase will be obviously conspicious:

"Ron Paul***delivered his message of freedom, peace and prosperity."

Which, come to think of it, could be getting to sound like a broken record, what with Mr. Paul's standing in the caucuses and primaries to date almost always near the bottom.

Hackneyed, come to think of it.

Not to mention being all the more so thanks to recent revelations that several newsletters published in Ron Paul's name and (presumed) authority between the mid-1980's and the Millennium contained racist, xenophobic, homophobic, anti-Semitic and otherwise bigoted language and comments.

Comments which Mr. Paul denies any responsibility for, not to mention being discredited by his old droogs in the Libertarian Party and the K Street crowd with libertarian articles of faith.

So: Who, then, was ultimately responsible for such odious comments in said newsletters as were published in Ron Paul's name? (Especially when it's well established that many of the articles in question are unsigned, leading many to wonder if Ron Paul "himself" wrote the articles, then turned around and denied responsibility--pure doublethink of the highest order, indeed, if such can be proven.)

And how much longer before these revelations come back to undermine the Paul Presidential campaign?

Expect, IMHO, same within measurable distance.

*************

AMONG THE PRINCIPLES GUIDING THIS RATHER AWFUL (THOUGH NOT EXACTLY THE WORST) BLOG is the common-law argument that "silence=acceptance."

Especially when weird and unwholesome elements hold positions of power, authority, trust and confidence expected of especially the Great Unwashed whose silence is all the more required to maintain the status quo--or so these same elements expect.

In other words, up there with the argument (itself flawed) suggesting that "knowledge is power" needs to be qualified with "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely" to justify silence and cooperation being mutually intertwined and, therefore, necessary. In Reality, however, the whole argument reeks of counsel to "goodthought" (itself Orwellian Newspeak for orthodoxy which, in and of itself, smacks of deliberate stupidity whose sole purpose is to protect a corrupt and dangerous status quo, all the while unaware of the African proverb that "insects which spoil the vegetable live inside the vegetable").

I, as a blogger, am proud to accept the argument that "silence=acceptance;" ergo, it's necessary to speak out and challenge the powers-that-be and that perversion of the Golden Rule ("He who has the gold makes the rules") which they want to use as an ur-cudgel to stifle dissent among the Great Unwashed in particular. 

THE CONCEPT OF DOUBLETHINK MAY HAVE ORIGINATED WITH GEORGE ORWELL and his novel Nineteen Eighty Four, yet it's managed to make its way into the dictionary, where it's defined as "illogical or deliberately perverse thinking in terms that distort or reverse the truth to make it more acceptable."

Quite the contrast to the Orwellian concept, which saw same as holding (and accepting as correct) two simultaneous and yet conflicting viewpoints of the same argument.

Which, put simply, suggests that "both sides may be right."

The sort of illogic which psychiatrists in certain Community Mental Health Centres will sometimes like deploying on such cases of theirs likely to be "troublemakers" or otherwise "too outpsoken" as a way to keep them in line with the prevailing views of the community (more likely than no a conservative-leaning such), and to accept same without question or reservation--usually with medication as reinforcing agent.

And if meds don't quite work, threaten them with incompetency proceedings in the courts, with "employment" in the local sheltered workshop seen as an alternative to avoid that possibility.

=============

Having been victim myself to the warped delusions of psychiatrists who enjoy using doublethink as a means of order and control, Your Correspondent can consider himself qualified to spot likely signs of doublethink in conservative propaganda, and the arguments so contained.

In any case: With today being the Martin Luther King, Jnr., holiday in the United States--the sort that racists and white supremacists would not like to celebrate, as opposed to Columbus Day--I should like to bring up a likely specimen of doublethink which the racist and white-supremacist community is fond of pushing:

If civil rights, diversity, multiculturalism and tolerance are to be looked upon as "Communist" or otherwise "un-American" (and, hence, threats to the Antient and Pecuilar Soverignty and Soverign Identity of the United States of America), are we to assume, then, that the only "true" and "pure" Americanism is one which excuses racism, bigotry, intolerance, xenophobia and the defence of White Christian Supremacy as "necessary" to the defence of said soverignty and soverign identity, not to mention the stability of a free-market capitalist system "necessary to the maintenance of said soverign identity"?

(Methinks we have a clear-cut example of illogic, pure and simple, as above. Which, moving from the sublime to the ridiculous, could further be excused as being one with "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's G-d" justifying same.)

As if that weren't enough, let's not forget where the same Communists who were holding high the banner of "the Great Unity of the Peoples of the World" were themselves guilty of racism and contempt for National Minorities. Witness these remarks from Nikita Khruschev's infamous "secret speech" of how the Stalin regime being so deflated saw this "Great Unity," usw.:

Comrades, let us reach for some other facts. The Soviet Union justly is considered a model multinational state because we have assured in practice the equality and friendship of all [of the] peoples living in our great Fatherland.

All the more monstrous are those acts whose initiator was Stalin and which were rude violations of the basic Leninist principles [behind our] Soviet state's nationalities policies. We refer to the mass deportations of entire nations from their places of origin, together with all Communists and Komsomols without any exception. This deportation was not dictated by any military considerations.

Thus, at the end of 1943, when there already had been a permanent change of fortune at the front in favor of the Soviet Union, a decision concerning the deportation of all the Karachai from the lands on which they lived was taken and executed.

In the same period, at the end of December, 1943, the same lot befell the [Kalmyks] of the Kalmyk Autonomous Republic. In March, 1944, all the Chechens and Ingushi were deported and the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Republic was liquidated. In April, 1944, all Balkars were deported from the territory of the Kabardino-Balkar Autonomous Republic to faraway places and their Republic itself was renamed the Autonomous Kabardian Republic.

Ukrainians avoided meeting this fate only because there were too many of them and there was no place to which to deport them. Otherwise, [Stalin] would have deported them also.

[***]

Similarly instructive is the case of the Mingrelian nationalist organization which supposedly existed in Georgia. As is known, resolutions by the Central Committee, Communist Party of the Soviet Union, were made concerning this case in November 1951 and in March 1952. These resolutions were made without prior discussion with the Politbiuro. Stalin had personally dictated them. They made serious accusations against many loyal Communists. On the basis of falsified documents, it was proven that there existed in Georgia a supposedly nationalistic organization whose objective was the liquidation of the Soviet power in that republic with the help of imperialist powers.

In this connection, a number of responsible Party and Soviet workers were arrested in Georgia. As was later proven, this was a slander directed against the Georgian Party organization.

We know that there have been at times manifestations of local bourgeois nationalism in Georgia as in several other republics. The question arises: Could it be possible that, in the period during which the resolutions referred to above were made, nationalist tendencies grew so much that there was a danger of Georgia's leaving the Soviet Union and joining Turkey?

(Animation in the hall, laughter).

This is, of course, nonsense. It is impossible to imagine how such assumptions could enter anyone's mind. Everyone knows how Georgia has developed economically and culturally under Soviet rule. Industrial production in the Georgian Republic is 27 times greater than it was before the Revolution. Many new industries have arisen in Georgia which did not exist there before the Revolution: iron smelting, an oil industry, a machine-construction industry, etc. Illiteracy has long since been liquidated, which, in pre-Revolutionary Georgia, included 78 per cent of the population.

Could the Georgians, comparing the situation in their republic with the hard situation of the working masses in Turkey, be aspiring to join Turkey? In 1955, Georgia produced 18 times as much steel per person as Turkey. Georgia produces 9 times as much electrical energy per person as Turkey. According to the available 1950 census, 65 per cent of Turkey's total population is illiterate, and 80 per cent of its women. Georgia has 19 institutions of higher learning which have about 39,000 students; this is 8 times more than in Turkey (for each 1,000 inhabitants). The prosperity of the working people has grown tremendously in Georgia under Soviet rule.

It is clear that, as the economy and culture develop, and as the socialist consciousness of the working masses in Georgia grows, the source from which bourgeois nationalism draws its strength evaporates.

As it developed, there was no nationalistic organization in Georgia. Thousands of innocent people fell victim to willfulness and lawlessness. All of this happened under the "genius" leadership of Stalin, "the great son of the Georgian nation," as Georgians like to refer to him.

[***]

Let us also recall the "affair of the doctor-plotters."

(Animation in the hall.)

Actually there was no "affair" outside of the declaration of the woman doctor [Lidiya] Timashuk, who was probably influenced or ordered by someone (after all, she was an unofficial collaborator of the organs of state security) to write Stalin a letter in which she declared that doctors were applying supposedly improper methods of medical treatment.

Such a letter was sufficient for Stalin to reach an immediate conclusion that there are doctor-plotters in the Soviet Union. He issued orders to arrest a group of eminent Soviet medical specialists. He personally issued advice on the conduct of the investigation and the method of interrogation of the arrested persons. He said that academician [V. N.] Vinogradov should be put in chains, and that another one [of the alleged plotters] should be beaten. The former Minister of State Security, comrade [Semyen] Ignatiev, is present at this Congress as a delegate. Stalin told him curtly, "If you do not obtain confessions from the doctors we will shorten you by a head."

(Tumult in the hall.)

Stalin personally called the investigative judge, gave him instructions, and advised him on which investigative methods should be used. These methods were simple--beat, beat and, beat again.

Shortly after the doctors were arrested, we members of the Politbiuro received protocols with the doctors' confessions of guilt. After distributing these protocols, Stalin told us, "You are blind like young kittens. What will happen without me? The country will perish because you do not know how to recognize enemies."

The case was presented so that no one could verify the facts on which the investigation was based. There was no possibility of trying to verify facts by contacting those who had made the confessions of guilt.

We felt, however, that the case of the arrested doctors was questionable. We knew some of these people personally because they had once treated us. When we examined this "case" after Stalin's death, we found it to have been fabricated from beginning to end.

This ignominious "case" was set up by Stalin. He did not, however, have the time in which to bring it to an end (as he conceived that end), and for this reason the doctors are still alive. All of them have been rehabilitated. They are working in the same places they were working before. They are treating top individuals, not excluding members of the Government. They have our full confidence; and they execute their duties honestly, as they did before.

(The "doctors' plot," it turned out, was a ruse by which Stalin sought to launch all-out pogroms against the Jewish population of the then-Soviet Union as would have made the Holocaust of Nazi Germany look like a cheap bus excursion to Branson of the kind the Great Unwashed are fond of. Stalin's death in March 1953 essentially short-circuited its outright implementation.)

=============

Here's another case of "spot the doublethink" to ponder:

If conservative thought expects the Lower Classes to regard free-market capitalism with American characteristics--a so-called "pure" capitalism, as it were, "completely and finally released from undue and unnecessary regulatory burden [and] opening the magic doors of free choice, competition and lower prices to the poor heretofore enslaved to State welfare and its tendencies towards Socialism"--it turns out being rather ironic, and then some, to discover where these same conservatives see the same Lower Classes in "clear and compelling need [of] 'pure' capitalism" as being @ high or extreme risk of contracting Moral Hazard (i.e., they should be held solely responsible for their actions, however immoral or unwise they may be, and they should not expect any help or mercy from the State in case problems develop--in other words, "they knew what they were doing, and they should get what they deserve. No more, no less").

And conservatives will, no doubt, be quick to blame public education for the Great Unwashed being all the more @ risk for Moral Hazard, and tendencies towards.

Why, you may ask?

The conservatives' likely answer: Because public education "has done nothing to promote a healthy and proper moral compass and True Patriot Love expected of the people and nation," especially if required for the sake of National Unity and Identity. (For "True Patriot Love," expect such to be hypernationalistic, xenophobic and ignorant.)

=============

Now try and show me where the examples I have illustrated above are not doublethink. You know where to leave the comments.