(The above, in case you're wondering, is a QR [as in Quick Response] Code for mobile phones equipped with the Kaywa QR Code Reader, so allowing you to read The Exaggerator on mobile phones enabled to access the Information Stuporbahn. It's free to download. Now you know.)
Have you considered subscribing to the RSS feed for this weblog?
You can do so right here, come to think of it--by way of e-mail, RSS feed readers, social-networking sites, what have you:
(Remember that you can always cancel your subscription @ any time. I won't hold it against you.)
(part 1):
Because the Social Security and SSI benefits Your Correspondent gets (remember, he's so emotionally disabled that he can't work) can only go so far, he'd appreciate it greatly (as would this blog) if you'd be kind enough to make a donation (not tax-deductible, sadly) to the (fully-secure and encrypted, know) Virtual Tip Jar:
You're also invited to check out my e-boutique, The Exaggerator Collection by name and stylee ... and/or, for that matter, these fine e-tailers that this blog is affiliate with:
(part 2):
If you're a blogger or webmaster looking to add value for money to your blog/website, please take a look @ these worthwhile options:
And why not take a moment to look @ PayPal as a way to add online shopping to your website, or otherwise raise funds.
HUMAN NATURE BEING THAT IT IS, THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT THAT HUMANS, UNLIKE ANIMALS, CAN MAKE MISTAKES AND RECOGNISE ERRORS within due course.
Witness New York Governor Elliot Spitzer acknowledging the substance of an item in The New York Times yesterday in which he was implicated in soliciting the services of a woman of easy virtue, and apologising for any embarrassment brought upon The Empire State and his family.
Which his political opponents responded to with this ultimatum: Either resign within 48 hours, or face impeachment proceedings before the New York Legislature.
But then again, expect Mrs. Warren's Profession to be out in full force in the Twin Cities coincident with the Republican National Convention after Labour Day; you may recall a recent news item which suggested that Republicans (conservatives in particular) are perhaps the best customers thereof. And consistent, come to think of it.
Not to mention the arrest of several prominent and powerful specimens of conservative Zealotry and True Belief there for consorting with known prostitutes ... as well as the Lindbergh Terminal Tap Dance which brought Sen. Larry Craig's career into tailspin.
=============
IN A RELATED VEIN ABOUT ERROR BEING A HUMAN CHARACTER TRAIT, Japanese tax police in Osaka arrested sisters Hatsue Shimizu and Yoshiko Ishii after discovering some ¥6 billion (about US$58 million/C$57.8 million/£28.9 million/€37.8 million/Rs2.35 billion/CHF59.66 million/A$62.75 million) in bank notes stashed away in cardboard boxes across ten locations in the Osaka region.
The whole being proceeds of inheritance from their father's estate, as died in 2004 and left ¥7.5 billion (about US$73 million/C$72.75 million/£36.35 million/€47.555 million/CHF75.102 million/Rs2.95 billion/A$79 million) between them, paying much less than the ¥2.86 billion (about US$28 million/C$27.8 million/£13.95 million/€18.25 million/CHF28.82 million/Rs1.131 billion/A$30.29 million) assessed for inheritance tax.
And yet the Zealots and True Believers of conservatism here in the "morally superior" United States want estate tax abolished in the name of "economic stimulation," but without offering alternative means to compensate for the ensuing loss of tax revenue (remember their hard-wired belief in low taxes=jobs=social stability, since discredited).
=============
STICKING TO THE SAME FLAWED EQUATION OF LOW TAXES=JOBS=SOCIAL STABILITY BEING AN ARTICLE OF FAITH, Minnesota Governor Pawlenty is invoking the majesty and authority of his office for potentially inapproriate purposes vis-a-vis the current state budget legislation.
As in using "public service" commercial message to call upon the "right-thinking" peoples of Minnesota (as in the poor, undereducated and easily-manipulate) to ask their DFL legislators in particular to vote against any budget proposals as translate into tax increases.
The reason? You guessed it: "Low taxes=jobs=social stability."
In effect, parroting the Club for Growth's ongoing patsy.
But then again, perhaps it was time to ask:
whether some of the worst job losses, especially in recent months, have come from low-tax-rate states (especially such where keeping taxes all the lower is seen as a Sanctii Sanctorum towards jobs creation--especially so unskilled positions paying mininum wage or piecework-linked rates); and, conversely,
whether some of the best jobs-creation numbers during much the same time period are from high-tax-rate states (especially so, again, with unskilled positions); and
whether there exists an interconnexion between tax rates and unemployment numbers (even allowing for such who have exhausted all job-search options following prolonged unemployment and those unable to owing to circumstances outside their direct control, such as age, disability, mental disorders, caring for elderly or infants and local economic conditions).
I believe there is research online on these topics; just do a Google or two.
*************
YOU'VE PROBABLY HEARD BY NOW ABOUT THAT ASSOCIATED PRESS STUDY WHICH FOUND WHERE THE DRINKING-WATER SUPPLIES OF SOME 43 MILLION AMERICANS were contaminate with old prescription and OTC medications as were flushed down the loo consistent with prevailing advice for so disposing.
Or so it turns out.
In any case, absent buyback programmes which pharmacies and health departments may have for taking outdated prescription medications, such can only be expected to remain a serious problem--especially when some of the meds flushed down the toilet and into local water supplies happen to include powerful antibiotics and prescription-only narcotics.
Too, there's also the fact of drug residues being passed in urine and no doubt likely to make its way into the water supply.
No doubt a dilemma which would vex even Throckmorton Gildersleeve in his role as Water Commissioner back in Summerfield, even with his being an ur-father for Leroy and Marjorie and the occasional battles of wits with Judge Hooker....
ONE THING THE ZEALOTS AND TRUE BELIEVERS OF FREE-MARKET HYPERCONSERVATISM HOLD DEAR is the notion that the free market is best equipped to deliver certain government services, programmes and schemes as are otherwise deemed "non-essential" or "unlikely to generate taxpayer value" under current conditions.
Hence, requiring "the healthy and beneficial effects of free-market competition and freedom of choice" being brought in, reinforced by outright subsidies and "incentives" "to stimulate competition and innovation," to "save the good taxpayers from themselves."
Case in point: Job Service, as in state-run and -sponsored Job Centres providing employment opportunity information, referrals to counselling and job training services and Unemployment Benefits applications.
Which, to the conservative way of thinking, amounts to an "illegal and unhealthy State monopoly" when it comes to employment services for the Lower Classes "in clear need of employment" in particular.
Their preferred solution? None other than the free market, by way of "Approved Employment Agencies" operating in the private, free-market sector, funded by the same public funds currently allocated Job Service (and all the while expected to remain fee-based on the employer's part).
Not to mention offering "incentives" and "bonuses" for placing such traditionally seen as "unemployable" or otherwise "difficult to employ" under Job Service, with particular emphasis on "welfare basket cases," "troublemakers" and the disabled, all of which would attract special premium incentive payments.
And encouraging said "Approved Employment Agencies" to "spontaneously" generate "whispering campaigns" through paid "singers" delivering glowing generalities about "job openings" in such milieus that the Lower Classes congregate (especially bars, liquor stores, convenience stores, fast-food restaurants and bus stops), referring them to the "agency" handling the applications (and coaching the "singers" all along with regards to the proper tone and nuance expected to be used, saying things like "Have you heard? So-and-So Company now has an urgent call for--" in a somewhat discreet, yet prissy, tone of voice).
You'll never guess who will stand to benefit more: Close droogs and lackeys of the conservative establishment, "entitled as of right" (or so the ensuing bromide is likely to put it).
And with the rank-and-file jobseekers finding the ensuing bureauracy to be all the more closer to the Kafka stylee.
Sesquicentennial Special: What other Minnesotans from history would I like over for dinner?
EXACTLY TWO MONTHS TO THE DAY OF THE 150-YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF MINNESOTA'S STATEHOOD, perhaps it was time for Your Correspondent to go through another round of imagining what figures of Minnesota history he'd like having for dinner, were the opportunity to exist in this respect.
This time, perhaps some literary figures ought enter the menu, as it were:
For starters, I'd have to invite two obvious Minnesota-born literary luminaries as started to make their mark in the 1920's, Sinclair Lewis and F. Scott Fitzgerald. Both, no doubt, sure to liven up the dinner-table conversation with their stories about the literary world they revolved around, Fitzgerald with his Jazz Age flamboyance and Lewis with his "salt-of-the-earth" Midwestern iconoclasm.
Maybe bring in Wanda Gág to liven things up with her woodblock prints and that tale of hers about "millions of cats" that's sure to send the dinner party into gales of laughter (I understand she was quite fond of cats herself).
Margaret Culkin Banning also deserves a spot @ the dinner table of Minnesota history; a female Sinclair Lewis of sorts, shall we assume?
How about Garrison Keillor, for something more modern, yet slightly provincial? Or, for that matter, "Captain Billy" Fawcett, what with his repretoire of smoking-car stories and banter from Capt. Billy's Whiz-Bang guaranteed to generate plenty of bellylaughs.
I'd have to bring in August Wilson as well, with his stage plays making quite the mark reflecting growing up black. Not to mention Charles Schulz, whose long-running comic strip "Peanuts" could be considered literature on the funny page reflecting the foibles of daily life through his childish world.
"MARTYRDOM MADE TO ORDER" SEEMS TO BE A JOURNALISTIC TECHNIQUE PREFERRED BY THE CONSERVATIVE PROPAGANDA MACHINE from time to time to serve their articles of faith--preferably where simple, easily-understood terms are used to better appeal to the Peter Griffin sort resident among culturally-deprived environments.
Case in point: WorldNetDaily's creating a "martyr complex" in a California family accused of not only refusing to send their children to the public schools and, instead, homeschooling same (citing "religious reasons"), but also of neglect and maltreatment. Some fresh developments in this non-story (and its treatment) come by way of the ConWebWatch blog as thus:
Another WorldNetDaily article by Bob Unruh on the case of California homeschooling parent Phillip Long, another effort to whitewash the behavior of the parents, and another failure to mention important issues in the case.
Why are Unruh and WND doing this? They're too close to the issue to tell the truth. Unruh and WND editor Joseph Farah have their children homeschooled, and they apparently don't want to admit--or let anyone else know--that there are bad apples in homeschooling.
But don't Unruh and Farah realize that by refusing to tell the truth to WND readers, they may actually end up harming homeschooling in the long run?
Unruh and WND have never mentioned the fact that, as courtdocuments have detailed (ashavewe), the Long family was providing a substandard homeschool education to their children:
The court described the education the children received at home as "lousy," "meager," and "bad," and that the supervision by the Christian school with which the family was affiliated was minimal at best.
One child testified that she "was not taught geography or history. Asked if she can add, subtract, multiply and divide, [she] stated she cannot."
WND has also not reported the history of the father. From court documents:
"Father has a long history of physically abusing the children and mother has a long history of not protecting them from father."
"[F]ather dominates mother and dominates the children who live at home. ... He will not permit the children to attend school. He will not permit them to receive childhood vaccinations. He will not permit the girls to wear pants at home. He will not permit birth certificates."
The court found the parents' home to be in "an endangering filthy, unsanitary and unsafe condition, and the minors were chronically filthy, and unsupervised late at night."
There are good homeschoolers--and there are also bad homeschoolers. The court has found Phillip Long and his wife to be bad homeschoolers and the father to be an abusive parent. WND's failure to tell the truth about the Longs to its readers leads to the inescapable conclusion that it condones such behavior.
Do Unruh and Farah treat their homeschooled children the way Phillip Long is on record as treating his? We hope not. We hope they don't think that such behavior is acceptable. But by staying silent about it, Unruh and Farah leave the impression that they do.
Shielding the Longs' dysfunctional family from public scrutiny in the name of protecting homeschooling, as Unruh and WND have done, will damage homeschooling in the long run because it contributes to an image of homeschooling being the province of extremist wackos.
We can't imagine anyone who truly cares about education and homeschooling would subject their children to the substandard education the Longs are on record as providing to their children. So why won't anyone within the homeschooling community admit that bad education is bad education, even (and, perhaps, especially) when it happens at home?
Through his biased reporting, Unruh is aiding and abetting the further abuse of the Long children by their parents. Is that what he and WND really want to happen to this family--or any family?
WND needs to decide: Will it shield and whitewash abusive parents so that they may further harm their children, or will it act as "fearless" as it claims to be and tell the truth?
UPDATE: We see that Michelle Malkin has latched onto this issue as well. But, like WND, Malkin fails to note the father's abuse or the "lousy" home education the children have received. You'd think that, with her demonstrated eagerness to attack 12-year-olds, Malkin would be rushing to tell the full story of the Long family. Apparently not.
No doubt about it: WorldNetDaily may actually be an unwitting Fifth Column for the cause of Christian Homeschooling, especially such based on apartheid South Africa's Nasionale Christen Opverdoing syllabus ... and all because of their glossing over the case of a homeschooling family with a fondness for abuse and neglect on the side.
AS NOTED ELSEWHERE, READERS, CAREFUL AND CAUTIOUS ESTIMATES SUGGEST THAT THE UR-RAHOWA IN IRAQ could cost $18 billion/diem this year alone.
Which can only make the National Debt much worse thanks all the more to His Fraudulency's misadventures.
And which explains why Your Correspondent intends to donate part of his share of commissions generated by your online shopping to reduction of the National Debt.
Until and unless someone can show valid cause why donations to reduce the National Debt are not wise use of money (and please, spare Your Correspondent any patsies and bromides you may have about "political reasons" justifying keeping the National Debt as high as it is), such is the way Your Correspondent plans to offer online shopping.
THE CHRISTIAN HOMESCHOOLING MOVEMENT, BASED AS IT IS ON FUNDAMENTALIST/PRIMITIVE CHRISTIAN TEACHINGS which, in their turn, are probably influenced by apartheid South Africa's syllabus of Nasionale Christen Opverdoing, enjoys overdoing it on nothing short of bromides, platitudes and bumper-sticker slogans in the guise of educating children towards "promoting a healthy and nutritious Christian Patriot Love" which is seen in the movement's Zealots and True Believers as lacking in a "failed and failing" system of public education.
Lacking, they will pathetically claim, because of the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Engel v. Vitale as declared organised and composed prayers in the public schools to be unconstitutional intermingling of Church and State--in particular the so-called "Regents' Prayer" composed by the New York State Board of Regents for aural recitation @ the start of the school day alongside the Pledge of Allegiance:
A-mighty G-d, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our Country. AMEN.
(In the actual ruling, due note was given that among the reasons for emigration to the United States given by the early colonists was the overzealous involvement--some would say interference--of the British Crown in creating the Book of Common Prayer for the Church of England in the 16th century.
(The fact of which Christian Homeschooling programmes will likely ignore or otherwise trivialise.)
Which, all in all, is expected to present the United States as having been "predestined" by Divine Revelation to be the Shining City on a Hill, Civitas Dei, Jerusalem of Gold, Direct Portal and Gateway to Heaven and True Centre of the World, the Universe and the 28 Known Galaxies--and whose "antient and pecuilar" status is thus seen as "under clear and present threat" by "dark forces" of "Secular-Progressive" orientation thus seen as a conspiratorial "Fifth Column" under "Jewish influence or control."
Such, no doubt, speaking volumes for the warped and perverted delusion which Christian Homeschooling programmes are forever seeing as the Christian Weltanschauung, especially when it comes to history, values and economics (in that last case, seeing free-market capitalism with American characteristics as Divinely Ordained and Predestined as the Great White Hope of the Lower Classes--provided such was granted "complete, final and binding regulatory relief").
=============
IN FACT, SUCH A WARPED CHRISTIAN WORLD VIEW AS IS PRESENTED IN CHRISTIAN HOMESCHOOLING could only carry a serious psychoemotional price in children thus homeschooled, and especially so when they try to adjust themselves to adult life on their own--expected, per the Biblical injunctions inherent in homeschooling, to "honour [support, to the Christian homeschooling perspective] thy Father and Mother" along especially financial models.
Especially considering the enforced social isolation Christian Homeschooling excuses as necessary, out of fear that Knowledge must be some class of a Loathsome Disease as could lead to Error by way of The Wrong Contacts and Associations.
The warped and perverted view of history (liberally reinforced with careless misinterpretation of the United States Constitution as Divinely-Inspired and -Ordained, to take one likely example) and kindred subjects prevailing throughout the Christian Homeschooling syllabus.
Subtle overtures and appeals to racist, white-supremacist and anti-Semitic feelings and prejudices, same expected to be seen as one with the defence of Christian Honour, Integrity and Patriot Love.
And the likelihood for lower-working-class families all too vulnerable to the Christian Homeschooling movement's glowing premises and generalities suffering all the more socioeconomically just to afford the homeschooling cirricular material--and perhaps making things worse by equating such suffering to that of the Christus and His Apostles, especially if the paterfamilias is fired or seriously injured and cannot find work for some time, forcing the family to turn to their savings (or what passes for it) just to maintain their homeschooling ways--that, and a hard-wired reluctance to go on welfare because of "Biblical injunctions" against asking for charity "lest moral error result."
Such, methinks, could be an interesting psychological case study subject, in case psychology majors are looking for ideas or inspiration for their doctoral thesis.
WORTH THINKING ABOUT IN THE LARGER SCALE OF THINGS INVOLVING INDECISION 2008: Recently-released estimates, arrived @ through careful and yet cautious means, suggest that the ur-RAHOWA in Iraq could cost the Good Taxpayers of the "morally superior" United States upwards of $18 billion/diem.
You read that right--$18 billion/diem!
And it's no wonder we are, or in serious danger of, recession and related socioeconomic dislocation--for which His Fraudulency's preferred approach is to throw out "stimulus incentives" starting @ $300 for such who qualify, hoping such will be wasted @ the local Wally World rather than face Reality and impose painful, yet necessary, tax increases upon especially "the Four Hundred."
This coming just as breaking advice emerges of five American soldiers being killed in a suicide-bomb attack in beautiful downtown Baghdad.
All in all, ask yourself: Is throwing out $18 billion per diem on a misguided ur-RAHOWA in the name of "preventing further infamous terrorist attacks," based all along on flawed or misleading evidence, really worth keeping taxes low just to create jobs and, in its turn, maintain socioeconomic stability?
*************
EXCEDRIN HEADACHE #1832: The FBI's opening some rather loaded enquiries into the executive compensation policies and general mortgage-lending practices of Countrywide Home Loans, the #1 "sub-prime/Alt-A" mortgage lender catering mostly to "chronic and habitual" welfare cases "needing a dose of healthy respect" for owner-occupancy which only free-market capitalism with American characteristics makes possible (or so the conservative line prevailing excuses the need for a "classless ownership society" being encouraged among the Lower Classes in particular).
Which could be grounds enough to call for a renewal of emphasis upon mutual self-help (in this case, by way of the building society model) as a way to help the deserving Lower Classes towards owner-occupancy housing. Or, better yet, cooperative-model housing developments.
*************
A RATHER BIZARRE SIDELIGHT OF THE PAST WEEKEND'S SNOWSTORMS IN THE OHIO VALLEY AND EASTWARDS would have to be the news footage of numerous spinout accidents on the I-64/77 bridge over the Ohio River in Charleston, West Virginia aggravated by icy road conditions.
Which might look more amusing (or would it not?) if such were scored to none other than the "March of the Toreadors" from Bizet's Carmen ... or, better(?) yet, the "Anvil Chorus" from Puccini's Il Trovatore, to cite obvious background music.
*************
TELL ME IF THE FOLLOWING SUGGESTION FROM L. BRENT BOZELL TO THE JOHN McCAIN PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN per The Washington Post, as quoted by The Carpetbagger Report, suggests where sugar-coated anti-Semitism may likely come into the McCain campaign playbook vis-a-vis the conservative delusion of Kulturkrieg:
Our culture is decaying from within, and most Republicans have been shamefully AWOL on this issue. McCain could begin a national conversation about parents, not the state, taking responsibility for their children and their communities. He should call on the entertainment industry to stop polluting America's youth with its videos and its music and on the Internet....
Which begs the question of whether the GOP's ideal of Amerikanischer Realkultur for the sake of "our culture***decaying from within" is probably closer to die Bransoner Muzikschaukultur, based as it is on an idealised notion of True Patriot Love in All Thy Sons Command--based, on closer inspection, upon the 1950's white middle-class Levittown ideal conservatives idealise more than anything.
An ideal excusing contempt towards the poor and National Minorities in the name of said Patriot Love. Not to mention a jingoistic brand of xenophobia rivalling anything North Korea churns out to keep the masses in line and forget the enforced misery and poverty which "Great Leader" Kim Jong Il expects will save North Korea from the likelihood of "American colonial occupation."
=============
AND WHILE ON THE SUBJECT OF THE PHONY KULTURKRIEG WHICH CONSERVATIVE PROPAGANDISTS MUST ENJOY PUSHING AS A DISTRACTION from The Big Picture (particularly from the standpoint of its supposedly contributing to Moral Harm in Right-Thinking [read: poor, undereducated and easily-influenced "white trash"] Families and their Children, with liberal doses of anti-Semitism and appeals to "Holy Blood and Soil," as reflected in die Bransoner Muzikschaukultur, as required), it's been noted that while broadcasters may be fond of using the TV Ratings Scheme to provide information, they don't complement such from time to time (especially when the content raises questions of Moral Harm) with content advice.
Solution: To better "get the message across" to especially the Lower Classes, said advisories might want to be broadcast in Engrish (same being given, per recommended advice, just before the show starts and coming out of commercial breaks). One recommended form being this Engrish version of an advisory which Canadian broadcaster CTV used when they transmitted The Sopranos a few years back:
This program for the child is not intended. That includes very rough way of talking and nude image violence scene. Perhaps a certain adult it has happened with contents. Consideration division of the viewer advises strongly.
Other Engrish forms of content advice which broadcasters could present as necessary include:
This program is suitable for viewing the family.
This program for the audience of 7 ages or less includes the scene of violence of the imagination or cartoon, is not nominated.
This program includes hint language. Consideration division of the parent advises.
This program characteristic includes language and the subject which are related. Consideration division of the viewer advises.
This program includes the scene of conduct and violence of characteristic of the animal. Consideration division of the parent advises.
This program includes strong language and violence scene. Consideration division of the parent advises.
This program includes the nude image. Consideration division of the viewer advises.
This program for the audience of 14 ages or less graphics or includes the scene of extreme violence with another method, is not nominated.
This program includes the characteristic hint language and the scene of the nude image. Consideration division of the viewer advises.
Therefore as for this program for the audience of the adult who grew the implication which should nominate the subject of adult.