see more crazy cat pics

FOR YEARS, YOUR CORRESPONDENT HAS HAD THIS RATHER SUBTLE SUSPICION that the British Sunday gazetta known as the News of the World is perhaps the most ironic name for a gazetta anywhere in the world.

Never mind that it began publication in 1844, thus translating into a long-established reputation for sensationalised excess, particularly when it came to reporting court cases in rather lurid and tasteless detail--so lurid, in fact, that Parliament passed the Judicial Proceedings Act 1926 to put controls on its reportage of especially lurid murder and sex crimes.

A reputation which was already well established when a certain Keith Rupert Murdoch acquired News of the World in 1967, quickly earning Murdoch the well-deserved nickname of "the Dirty Digger" (by way of the satiric journal Private Eye, taking advantage of Murdoch's Australian origins)--and making it even more lurid and tasteless, not to mention racist and jingoistic, qualities which would be carried over into Keith Rupert's next Fleet Street trophy, The Sun, after his acquisition thereof in 1969.

In any case, News of the World still ranks as the top-selling Sunday gazetta between Land's End and John O'Groats, attracting some nine million readers Who Should Know Better with a rather pornographically tasteless mix of sleaze and scandal packaged as "responsible journalism," not to mention the lure of Big Big Money to readers willing to provide some especially juicy scandal as can make or break reputations, bring down governments or send The City into sheer panic.

And its journalistic focus, alas for it! still seems to be confined to England's Green and Pleasant Land, with little else in the way of world news coverage, if @ all; hence, the very name News of the World quickly becomes its own worst joke @ the expense of its readers among the ranks of the EastEnders/Coronation Street crowd, by and large.

The kind more than likely to take their summer's holidays in the likes of Blackpool or, worse yet, Butlin's Holiday Camps ... do their shopping @ ASDA (the British affiliate of Wally World, in case you didn't know), Tesco or Marks and Sparks just because prices are lower there ... and tend to watch FreeVee, even if it means having to pay an annual licence fee while News of the World rails against suspected "elitism" in BBC programmes in the hope of forcing more American-stylee programming on the likes of ITV, Channel 4 and 5.

What could be more ironic than to name a rather narrowly-focused gazetta (and a Sunday gazetta in particular) the News of the World, even without "the Dirty Digger" controlling the strings from New York?

And BTW: Are there any of you blog readers from between Land's End and John O'Groats who concur with these comments? Comments always welcome.

• Memories of abuse, cruelty and maltreatment, not to mention an upbringing revolving, for the most part, around institutional and foster care.
• Items I come across on the news, especially so BBC News ("it's a small world, after all," folks), but also CNN while watching same during my morning rounds @ a certain motel here in Winona, MN (details on request).
• Allusions to old-time radio programmes, Hanna-Barbera animations and other TV shows and movies I find interesting.
• "Engrish" @ its finest.
• The mundane(?) details of the everyday routine I live in spite of myself and my dyslexic condition, as well as contacts with Mein Innkeeper Friend (who, without a doubt, has influenced, in a way, my Secular-Progressive leanings which can be evident in this blog).

Does this answer your question, readers?

But then again, I think English novelist Evelyn Waugh (1903-1966) had the best answer to how a blogger works: "I just write the words down and then push them around a bit."

THIS THURSDAY IS SEEING HERE IN THE MINNWISSIPPI REGION WHERE YOUR CORRESPONDENT RESIDETH a rather nice day approaching the Mother's Day weekend--not to mention that marking the 150-year anniversary of Minnesota Statehood, the actual anniversary thereof occuring Sunday.

Isn't that something of a coincidence?

Heading into the weekend, expect there to be a rather showery period through the weekend into early in the week ahead up this way. The fact of which was enough to prompt moi to, following his morning's service @ the motel here in Winona, do a little stocking up (as it were) on laundry detergent (Watkins Lemon Liquid, a super-concentrated affair as works rather well), liquid Calgon water softener (a necessity, considering where the water in these parts is hard and can do a number on laundry) and a few stamps to get ready for the increase in letterpost rates to 42˘ come Sunday.

(Incidentally, if you still have mail stamped with 41˘ such as is going out either Friday or Saturday, rest assured that such will be delivered without the postman asking for postage due on the receiver's end.)

*************

THOSE OF YOU STILL HARD-WIRED IN YOUR ZEALOTRY AND TRUE BELIEF AS A GOOD CHRISTIAN FOR THE TERRIBLE-TEMPERED MR. BANG in Indecision 2008 might want to reconsider after seeing this video of TTMB's "other" Spiritual Advisor, Rev. Rod Parsley, calling for nothing short of RAHOWA (as it were) against Islam, and excusing such as America's Predestiny:

Cf. Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli, vintage 1797, which itself has been the subject of dispute and overzealous interpretation in Certain Less-Enlightened Circles (thanks to Wikipedia for the text):

As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

=============

COME TO THINK OF IT, YOU HAVE TO WONDER IF THE TERRIBLE-TEMPERED MR. BANG'S SEEKING OUT THE ELMER GANTRY ELEMENT as a way to pacify the Religiopolitical Right amounts to a show of serious desperation for the GOP.

I say "serious desperation" inasmuch as they're experiencing serious financial as much as morale problems of the highest sort heading into Indecision 2008's campaign becoming dead earnest. Problems which are no doubt sure to scare off any semblance of financial support from "angels" among the ranks of "the Four Hundred" in particular as would be their Last and Only Hope for Salvation.

Problems which, beyond any doubt, could mean that the GOP will likely be asked to have their advertising buys paid for in cash; likewise with those involved with their 2008 National Convention in the Twin Cities after Labour Day from the standpoint of electronics, lighting, audio/visual, logistics and related matters. 

Come to think of it: Might I suggest that the GOP place themselves under administration per the same restrictive bankruptcy laws they pushed for a few years back; the better so they can find out what it feels like to be put under administration?

*************

ESTIMATES OF THE DEATH AND DEVASTATION FROM THE RECENT CYCLONE AND TIDAL SURGE AFFLICTING THE SO-CALLED "UNION OF MYANMAR" have now been dramatically raised higher--as in some 100,000 dead and over one million displaced or left homeless.

Aid shipments arriving, yet subject to delay by the military regime's insisting that entry visas be "in proper form" (or so the junta's "inside of the inside" thinks), particularly among those with international relief agencies.

Not to mention fresh reports emerging that the regime failed to issue proper or timely warnings beforehand, nor conduct any evacuations from areas of the Irrawaddy Delta as were especially prone to devastation, thus worsening the casualty numbers. Let alone the prospect of the regime's "inside of the inside" watching "elegant poornoo" in their bunker while death and destruction held high carnival, oblivious to what was going on in The Real World.

*************

HILLARY RODHAM-CLINTON'S LATEST PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN GAMBIT, NOTWITHSTANDING HER CAMPAIGN'S SERIOUS FINANCIAL DESPERATIONS, is to have Congress declare the ilk of OPEC as Illegal Cartels Contrary to Public Interest--let alone American Energy Self-Reliance based on North Korea's juche model, with necessary adaptations to conform to free-market capitalist models and paradigms.

Regardez: It's my understanding that consumer-protection advocates in Louisana won default judgement against OPEC a few years back on charges of Antitrust Law Violations.

The which, like The Terrible-Tempered Mr. Bang's delusion of a gas tax holiday over the summer, is "good concept, but no sense"--which, in this case, amounts to nothing short of licence to engage in wasteful and potentially counterproductive exploratory drilling in especially such areas unlikely to have commercially viable crude oil deposits worth extracting in profitable quantities. Besides, virtually all the major oil fields in the major oil-producing regions (as in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Louisana and California) are past their prime in terms of production, requiring costly and potentially harmful extraction methods to maintain any semblance of useful production ... and, even with the discoveries in the Bakken fields of northwestern North Dakota into eastern Montana, such may not be enough to adequately meet American oil and gas requirements until such time as decent infrastructure (pipelines and storage facilities in particular) can be set up.

That, and asking whether His Fraudulency's Great Within may secretly be paying oil companies to take refineries out of production just to keep supplies low and prices high--and maximise the value of any futures contracts they may secretly be investing in.

What stands in the way of such a possibility being looked into?  

ITEM FROM CONWEBBLOG as makes note of a job vacancy @ the conservative "news portal" WorldNetDaily:

A May 5 WorldNetDaily job posting for a "highly motivated editor-writer" begins: "Do you have what it takes to be part of the WND editorial team?"

While the posting lists only "demonstrable experience in reporting and editing" as a requirement, there's another important part of "what it takes" that's not mentioned: a desire to slant the news to the right, unfairly depict those you don't agree with and frame their claims through the eyes of their critics, and to portray conservative and/or right-wing Christians and Jews as positively as possible while refusing to report any criticism of them (or, if it is reported, not treat it as legitimate).

Well, that's obviously how folks like Aaron Klein and Bob Unruh got their WND gigs. Joseph Farah wouldn't have hired them if they didn't.

Which, in effect, raises a point of the offering being misleading by omission or obfuscation of material facts, in violation of Basic Principle 3 of the Better Business Bureau Advertising Code ("An advertisement as a whole may be misleading although every sentence separately considered is literally true. Misrepresentation may result not only from direct statements, but by omitting or obscuring a material fact").

In other words, only hard-core goodthinkers need apply.

YOUR CORRESPONDENT WAS PERHAPS ONE OF THE FIRST TO QUESTION THE TERRIBLE-TEMPERED MR. BANG'S SUGGESTION of a summer suspension of the Federal gas tax to bring down gas prices, and the illogic thereof.

As in "good concept, but no sense"--which, in case any of you ask, was inspired by something read on Engrish.com recently about humourous Japanese T-shirts with English-language messages.

And it seems there is emerging editorial, as much as political, opposition to such a concept, considering where the Federal Highway Trust Fund is financed from gas tax revenue. In the former instance, Dave Zweifel, Editor Emeritus of The Capital Times in Madison, WI, as just last week "went virtual," had this to say--and ponder over:

It's one of the dumbest ideas to come down the pike in a long time.

I'm talking about John McCain's plan to give America a summer-long gasoline tax "holiday" to ease our pain at the pump.

Republican McCain would have the U.S. stop collecting the 18.4˘-per-gallon excise tax, ostensibly to make it "cheaper" for all of us to jump in our cars and go traveling this summer. That Democrat Hillary Clinton would buy into this scheme speaks volumes about her priorities as well.

The United States has already fallen dangerously behind in maintaining its infrastructure. Interstate bridges are falling down, highway maintenance is far behind schedule, and mass transit is being starved for funds. This is hardly the time to put a bigger dent in the country's ability to fund transportation needs.

To his credit, Barack Obama has called the McCain plan a terrible idea. It's so bad that it ranks right up there with George Bush's tax cuts for the rich, which McCain once opposed but now favors. Those cuts have served to starve much-needed domestic programs while doubling the national debt, which the country will have to face up to sometime in the not-too-distant future.

Clinton defends her support of McCain's tax holiday because she would balance the loss in revenues by enacting an excess profits tax on oil companies. Admittedly, that's a bit more responsible than McCain's proposal, but it fails to address the real issue. We ought to be discouraging the consumption of gasoline and oil, not encouraging people to use more. Besides, good luck getting that excess profits tax through the current administration.

It would be far better to enact an excess profits tax to fix those cracks in the highway bridges and to improve mass transit so Americans don't have to buy so much $3.60-a-gallon gasoline.

Those who keep tabs on the oil industry are convinced that the price is actually going to be four bucks a gallon by the height of the summer travel season. That 18.4˘ "savings" would quickly be swallowed up by the oil industry.

Meanwhile, we would fall further behind not only in fixing our highways, but in doing what we should have been doing for decades now: finding ways to use less gasoline.

Good concept, but no sense reaffirmed.

Pass this along to all you know online....